![]() this tool should not have dependencies on corporate infrastructure"īut like a lot of armchair moralising, he isn't willing to debate the hard choices that go into building successful software. He finishes with a call to action: "We as a community need to come up with a viable solution and alternative to Signal that is easy to use and that does in fact respect people’s choices. He says he thinks the protocol is secure, then says he doesn't want it to use GCM because it routes messages via Google who he doesn't trust (fixing that is the point of the encryption) and then talks about an attack that'd apply to any app regardless of whether it used GCM or not. ![]() He says he recommended Signal because it was easy to use (more consumer friendly I guess) and secure, then says he wouldn't have gone in the direction of making it easier to use and criticises the things that make it user friendly, like using phone numbers instead of usernames. Like a lot of crypto-puritanism it is rather mixed up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |